Sunset Star 7 by Brian Sapere

 

Part 4

 

 

From Chapter 2 – Psychodynamics of Rape – in Men Who Rape by Nicholas Groth

 

MULTIPLE MOTIVES UNDERLYING RAPE

 

Regardless of the pattern of the assault, rape is a complex act that serves a number of retaliatory and compensatory aims in the psychological functioning of the offender. It is an effort to discharge his anger, contempt, and hostility toward women – to hurt, degrade, and humiliate.  It is an effort to counteract feelings of vulnerability and inadequacy in himself and to assert his strength and power – to control and exploit. It is an effort to deny sexual anxieties and doubts, and reaffirm his identity, competency and manhood. It is an effort to retain status among male peers, and it is an effort to achieve sexual gratification.  Rape is equivalent to symptom formation in that it serves to defend against anxiety, to express a conflict, and to gratify an impulse.  It is symptomatic of personality dysfunction, associated more with conflict and stress than with pleasure and satisfaction.  Sexuality is not the only – nor the primary – motive underlying rape. It is, however, the means through which conflict surrounding issues of anger and power become discharged. Rape is always a combination of anger, power, sexuality, and each of these components must be examined in evaluating the offender and assessing the impact of the assault on the victim and the nature of her trauma.

 

. . .The assault triggers an acute disruption of the victim’s physiological, psychological, social, and sexual lifestyle as evidenced by somatic problems, disturbances in sleeping and eating patterns, and the development of minor mood swings and fears specific to the circumstances of the assault.(1)  The sexual offense, from this standpoint, constitutes a situational crisis imposed on the victim, and the impact of the assault may disrupt the bio-psycho-social functioning of the victim for an indefinite period of time. Tragically, her victimization often does not end with the assault.

 

(1) Ann Wolbert Burgess and Lynda Lytle Holmstrom, Rape: Crisis and Recovery

 


 

Horn: "Just forget all this crap about 'motherhood' and 'marriage' – it's not for you. You'd kill any poor kid or slob who ever lived with you – can't you see that? You're a real sick girl. If you weren't such a sick lesbian, you wouldn't even be interested in any of those weak men in the first place. All you really need is a big, juicy cock and royal fuck in the ass from a REAL Man!"

 


 

Since the "REAL Man" could never stand rejection or take "NO" for an answer, stop lying or quit pretending, rationalizing and projecting, scapegoating and gaslighting, he arranged and conducted a special class and kangaroo court, forced "confession" and character assassination, claiming that his rape victim was "a Real Man hater" and "man eater" – "rotten apple" and "rotten egg" – "habitual liar" and "self-willed, ill-willed bitch" – "hateful, hard-hearted Snow Queen, Judas and betrayer of Christ" – "evil saboteur and enemy of 'the Work'. . ." 

 

Horn also told Abe's father, Bob Klein: "Pick the kid up and keep him away from her!"

  

Sharon called me the next day to say:

 

"You must feel relieved now that the baby is gone."

 

"No, sorry – you can't have any contact with him until you start to 'wake up' and 'get well'. It's for his own good. You're a sick lesbian and vicious, murderous mother. You'd kill the poor boy 'in essence' if he stayed with you. He's already becoming autistic."

 


 

 

 

 


 

Sharon: "You should try to forget the child.  Just pretend you're a distant relative – like the boy's aunt, or something."

 


 

From The San Francisco Progress – Jan. 12, 1979

 

 A long-term member, single at the time, was directed to marry up – or get out…  The problem was that the young lady he met and married didn't know about the package deal, i.e., that she didn't just get a husband, but a weird theatre group, and the Horns, too.  When she did get the big picture, she also got out.  She got two things for her pains:  a beating and an annulment.  She was pregnant at the time, by about a month…

 

Kathleen Salmon-Mandis was also pregnant when she left.  When I asked her (given the facts that members spent all of their spare time working at the theatre, often ‘til near dawn, when they would go to their daytime jobs) what child-care was provided, she answered with anger in her voice.

“None! The babies and toddlers were kept in cribs backstage until all hours. The parents didn’t have time to give to the kids and the theater, too. The theater took precedence.”

Reproduction was a big factor in the group. At one juncture, Sharon Gans-Horn directed all of the couples to get pregnant within thirty days. All complied, except one couple who just didn’t seem to be able to meet the deadline.

When Kathleen Salmon left the group, Mark divorced her. Shortly after the birth of the child, Mark Salmon and Fred Mindel appeared on her doorstep and demanded custody of the child. Using the usual tactics of the Horn philosophy, they told her that “she was an unfit mother who would kill her child.”  The terrified mother finally placed a call to the police and the pair fled.

 


 

Anonymous said on Esoteric Freedom blog – Jan, 9, 2010:

 

Can anyone tell me why an adopted child and her sister will never be told the truth? Older students adopted a younger student’s child nearly 30 years ago, while I was in the group. I am still in touch with this troubled young woman who still does not know, and when confronted, her parents will never reveal the truth, and the birth mother will not come forward. The girl needs to know [the truth] as she is now facing serious health problems, and family history could help. I have really tried to understand possible reasoning for this behavior from a teacher of ‘the Work’.  Even if it is not ‘the Work,’ Sharon and Robert still ‘think’ they are representing it [so] why would they insist on burying the truth to this extent?  What profit or benefit [could there be] to all or any involved?  Can anyone reading this enlighten me? Who would ever want to go to their grave with the burden of these kind of lies!  Can a mother forget the child of her womb????
 
 

NO! IF YOUR CHILD WERE MISSING, YOU’D THINK ABOUT IT EVERY MINUTE!!!

 


 

Sharon: "We're only trying to help you 'get well', but you always think you know best. But what do you know, anyway?  Have you seen the Light?  Bob has his problems, but they're nothing like yours – YOU can't do anything right!"

 

"Who do you think you're kidding and trying to fool?!  You weren't supposed get married or have any more children! You're a lesbian – don't you know that by now?  You were supposed to join the other single females who 'agreed' to participate in my husband's 'sexual experimentations'…  My husband is really mad. I strongly advise you to get the marriage annulled tomorrow and participate in his most important 'work on being'."

 

  "No, you can't see the child again for awhile. You need a 'period of adjustment' with your new husband."

 

   "Why don't you just admit what a cheap cunt, tramp and whore you are?  . . . stop lying and quit trying to whitewash your filthy life."

 


 

The unconscious projection of one's own problems onto others helps to reduce tension. But what about the real situation?  ~ Idries Shah

 


 

When it comes to damage, there is no real difference between physical, sexual and emotional abuse. All that distinguishes one from the other is the abuser's choice of weapons.

 

Emotional abuse is the systematic diminishment of another.  It may be intentional or subconscious (or both), but it is always a course of conduct, not a single event.

 

Emotional abuse can be active. Vicious belittling and deliberate humiliation: "You're fat. You're stupid. You're ugly."

 

Emotional abuse is unique because it is designed to make the victim feel guilty and unworthy – unworthy of respect and friendship, love and protection.

 

  ~ Andrew Vachss

   Parade Magazine

 


 

Diogenes said on Esoteric Freedom blog – Sept 17, 2010:

 

As usual, it is the women who were hurt most.  And like rape victims who do not testify because it is too painful to go through that [ordeal], the women who were hurt by the Gans-Horn cult do not come forward. But unless they do come forth … it is all hearsay.

 

 

Anonymous said on Esoteric Freedom blog – May 4, 2009 [excerpt]:

 

No, most of the stories have not been told.  I hear new ones all the time.  I meet people who left the group 20-30 years ago and have not spoken to anyone about it since.  Some people are still under the code of silence.  The most sensitive of those stories have not been told on the web.  You haven’t heard about the rapes and sexual humiliations yet . . . not the old stuff from California but the stuff that is still going on . . . Have you heard about Sharon's abortions?  About the abortions she forced other women to have?  You have not heard the actual names of many of these people yet. Their families still do not know.  Many children still do not know who their real parents are because they were traded at birth within the group.  Marriages are still being forced on people.  People are still being manipulated into divorcing loving spouses. It will all come out. Give it time.

 

 

Cber7 said on Rick Ross – Mar 5, 2005 [excerpt]:

 

How do they succeed?  How do they get away with all of this?  How do they fool so many people so much of the time?  You might as well ask how did Hitler and Stalin get away with their agenda.  It is the exact same chilling phenomenon, just a different scale.  Hitler and Stalin liquidated people who got in their way or threatened them.  Stalin, when he did not make people "disappear" sent them to the Gulags. With Sharon Gans or Alex Horn, when they send you away, you too become a non-person.  You are in fact treated as a disease by the diseased!

 


 

The Cults